Quick answerFor early Week 1 PPR decisions, our leans are Joe Burrow over Jared Goff, D'Andre Swift over Tyler Allgeier, Chris Olave over Quentin Johnston, and Colston Loveland over Juwan Johnson—assuming normal availability and roles. These are alternative-specific choices, not instructions to bench every player on the other side.
Week 1 start/sit picks at a glance
| Decision | Early lean | When to reconsider |
|---|---|---|
| Burrow or Goff · 1QB | Start Burrow | Availability, protection concerns or material scoring differences |
| Swift or Allgeier · PPR | Start Swift | A verified change to either backfield's workload |
| Olave or Johnston · WR/FLEX | Start Olave | A restriction on Olave's role or a substantial opportunity change |
| Loveland or Johnson · TE | Start Loveland | Availability, route involvement or unusual TE scoring |
Quarterback: Joe Burrow over Jared Goff
The published early consensus places Burrow well above the low-end QB1 range occupied by Goff. We would not abandon that substantial baseline gap because of one favorable-looking defensive matchup. In a 1QB league, Goff is an alternative to compare with other fringe starters; in superflex, both may belong in the lineup. The decision is different when you are filling two QB-eligible slots.
Running back: D'Andre Swift over Tyler Allgeier
For a Week 1 starting spot, our early preference is Swift. Allgeier is an interesting roster addition, but adding a player for uncertain future opportunity is not the same as immediately starting them. Arizona's published depth chart should not be treated as a promise of carries; early depth-chart order and regular-season usage can diverge. Move this comparison only when new workload evidence justifies it.
Receiver: Chris Olave over Quentin Johnston
Olave is the stronger early PPR starting choice in this pair. The Saints list him with the first-team offense. Johnston can still be worth rostering where available, but our default is to demand a stronger reason than a speculative touchdown for elevating a lower-ranked alternative. If news points to a limited role for Olave, reassess instead of relying on the name.
Tight end: Colston Loveland over Juwan Johnson
Our opening lean favors Loveland. Johnson is a fallback to investigate when you need a tight end, not an automatic upgrade over someone in our starter tier. At this position, a single touchdown can overwhelm a small sample. For close choices, look for routes, targets and expected participation rather than treating last season's touchdown total as a weekly floor.
How to use a start/sit recommendation
- Make the comparison within your actual eligible lineup slots.
- Use the correct reception and passing-touchdown scoring.
- Remove confirmed unavailable players and account for meaningful workload restrictions.
- Favor the stronger baseline when the gap is clear; use role and matchup evidence for close calls.
- Keep an unlocked replacement if you wait for late news.
A 'sit' lean in this article is not a drop recommendation. A useful player can be the worse of two good options. Conversely, a deep-league manager may need to start someone outside a shallow-league starter tier. Do not sacrifice season-long roster value solely because of one opening-week comparison.
Week 1 starts on Wednesday: check your lineup deadline
The opener is September 9; Week 1 ends September 14. Set your initial lineup early and check your league's actual locks.
Put an earlier-game starter in a dedicated position and preserve FLEX for a later player where possible. This keeps more replacements eligible if late news changes your plan. A full-lineup lock removes that flexibility; do not assume your league uses individual-player locks.